Two Poems by Daniel Jenkins (poetry, ’18) from the Tupelo 30/30:

 

 

From Daniel:

I loved everything about writing for Tupelo Press’s 30/30 Project this past August. Yes. I did have a mental breakdown. But who wouldn’t? Writing poems on demand was, well, demanding. After a conversation about love poems with some of my closest friends from Warren Wilson, I decided embrace an insane virtual tour of the world through the voice of a speaker searching for a lost love. This involved a ton of research on place and culture. Wow. Not only did it bring closer to the world at large, but to my little world here. After a while, the majestic and mysterious swallowed me whole, stretched my imagination. One stop included Mountain River Cave in Vietnam—the largest in the world. Once the poem appeared on the Tupelo 30/30 blog, I received a friend request from a girl who worked as a tour guide for  Mountain River Cave. My favorite experience came when writing poems for friends who’d donated to support my campaign. I wrote about destinations and themes important to them, which was much more satisfying. I feel I grew closer to everyone. I loved every second. These are just some of the many reasons I’m grateful to Tupelo for the opportunity to write for thirty days. I heard faculty tell us to write immediately after graduation. Well, it worked.

On the two poems—In March 2017, I started taking pictures of my boring food and writing absurd and hyperbolic descriptions of them. We all found this funny, and soon the joke caught on. It brought people joy. That’s why I loved doing it. “Cook-Out on Tunnel Road” was based on my last Cook-Out visit with Jodie Free before graduating. The second, ” Dvīpa Sukhadhara,” is about Socotra Island, one of the most unique places on the planet. Over 33% of plant life, and a few strands of DNA, are found only on Socotra.

Cook-Out on Tunnel Road
Asheville, North Carolina

What I meant when I said hushpuppy
was this: oil-baked bread-crusted dinner donut,
half-dozen’d, splashed with shredded
leaf globe, or what you call home-made slaw.
Words were not enough—so I said, stuffed
in a styrofoam cup, cold cow tit cream,
brightly-iced powder cane, lactose whip,
polystyrene drink. I should’ve just said milkshake,
but I didn’t, and you said thinly-grated swine saucer
in red pepper paint—a barbecue pork plate—
or instead of onion rings you said ringed white
pungent-fruit fry-breaded, or when I tried
to say potato-sheaved fry double-dozen’d—
why the fuck didn’t I just say French fries?—
French fries aren’t French. In lapses of absence,
of presence, glades, hazes, ourselves sunk
by slight indulgence, dizzied beyond by words,
let’s just say filets of flightless bird,
twice salted, instead of chicken breast,
or just say wine instead of sulfide-derided
vine juice. Good things time-capsuled,
and we will mean it’s okay, it’s going to be okay.
I know another two dozen suns is a day.
I know it. It brings merciful, forgiving shade.

  for Jodie Free 

Dvīpa Sukhadhara
Socotra Archipelago

The clefts and caves in the steeper drops
to the water, somewhere once called very good,
a relief from the shades, some eternal
effect of self-knowledge, Socotra—word a brazen

arrow swiftly flung from Sanskrit, meaning,
island supporting bliss. The rhetoric of her waves,
the hills billow the down-cone tops of trees,
kindled roots in the air, pores opened for Thomas

the apostle, his finger jabbing at his side
to show the space between two ribs the centurion
pierced Christ. Thomas in tatters, waving a staff,
recalled his face-falling, crying, my savior

and my god! Once Thomas left, a stone hut
stood molten gray, barely holy. I think he left
not from failing faith, but from boredom.
You, however, only came at night, shifting

wisp of claw prints lizard-made, spaces opening
decades: yes, I heard you say, we are quite rare—
you’ll find these genetic lines made nowhere
else. Nothing else but silence. I wait for you, I said,

the fishermen, shepherds and vinedressers
building huts, docks, boats, homes, years and years
still going, still in longest being. On the brown
hills the trees loosened from the dirt and marched

louder than the sultan’s armies or the Portuguese,
and as the down-coned trees sunk into the sea,
leaving their holes, glowing embers in each sprung
to form like marionettes, and from them came

the bones of the dead redressed in skin, in hair,
with lips, with blank eyes. These reformed Socotrans
danced in the basins of unbundled churches,
waiting for the day’s catch, where I prayed you’d be,

tangled up with fish—your throat, mezzo, loosed
to liberating rage, to song and songs sung, of
this free, ageless thrust, glaze of sun dying off
its red haze, giving life, giving life, giving more

than the life I’m a fool to believe is my own
to waste. So—there you were, there kneeling
in the black dirt by the sea, the rocks wiped clean
of briny whitewater, singing to me, plant here

what no one from this time till then plants elsewhere.

An excerpt from “Lake” by Ethna McKiernan (poetry, ’04), one of two poems published at Postcards, Poems, and Prose:

Lake

Filmy ribs of light

beneath the surface, swirling

as my calves step in.

Liquid silk immersion, sky above

a calm bowl of blue.

The willow tree on the shore

shaking its arms back and forth.  […continue reading here]

An excerpt from “Wait Time” by Katie Runde (fiction, ’12) published at Pithead Chapel:

Wait Time

Margot poured her second glass of cabernet. She sat in the screen porch room next to Brian’s room, as attuned to him and his breathing as she had been to her newborn babies, in those weeks when she convinced herself she couldn’t be trusted to keep them alive. She listened to Liz and Evy breathe in those weeks, waiting in a half-second of panic for each exhale. She breathed in their warm talc and milk heads, and breathed in and out to gather herself for a second when she want to scream at the ugly three-am wake-ups and the long, low cries of loneliness or hunger they let out, and she breathed in the smell of brewing coffee, the only thing that separated night from day.

Seventeen years after those babies, Margot listened to the labored letting-go of their dad, to the slight wheeze and little hum, the occasional sigh that signaled either temporary relief or awe at the constant dreams that were blurring into the end for him; she couldn’t tell which and he couldn’t tell her.

When Liz told Margot she was meeting her friend Kaylee tonight, Margot knew she was lying. She never hung out with Kaylee. But she did a quick risk-benefit analysis, taking into consideration her own depleted capacity for thinking ahead and the chances that Liz would give her that death-stare she had been perfecting lately that seemed to pierce every cell in Margot’s body if she said no. She had a feeling Liz was going to meet the guy she had been hanging around with from work, who she also knew about despite her daughter’s efforts to keep him a secret. Margot considered the inevitable, awful truth that Liz would eventually have sex with someone, someday, and the not-all-that-reassuring fact that she had at least gotten an A in her Sex Ed unit of health class. The blank, Lexapro-induced Zen state she had been operating in since May that dampened any panic took over, and she’d let her go. Evy was out too, and she realized she hadn’t even asked her where she was going. […continue reading here]

An excerpt from “On World-Making” BY Nomi Stone (poetry, ’17) published at Poetry Foundation:

On World-Making

To love is to tell the story of the world.     There was
an ocean with a boat     mountains     a meadow     too painful to stare
at directly. Haven’t I been here before? Yes.     No:     not quite here.
“It is not as if,” the philosopher writes, “an I exists
independently over here and then simply loses a you over there.”
In the mist, a man rigs the Suzelle, little red boat.
Loved labored for months, learning to tie the right knot. The exact
and only knot that will keep the vessel tethered. She rehearsed
for the worst possible thing. “The attachment to you,” it is written,
“is part of what composes who I am.” I know/knew
those hands, hers. I watched her dust the sourdough with flour […continue reading here]

An excerpt from an interview with Dilruba Ahmed (poetry, ’09), conducted by Angela Narciso Torres (poetry, ’09), and published at NER:

NER poet Dilruba Ahmed (“Underground,” NER39.2) talks with Editorial Panel member Angela Narciso Torres about public acts of resistance and private acts of opposition, the music and mystery of her own mother’s poetry, and the wonder of a new collaboration with an old friend.

Angela Narciso Torres: Like many of the poems in your poetry collection, Dhaka Dust, “Underground” addresses contemporary social issues while also being deeply rooted in history. Can you talk more specifically about the origins and the historical/societal context that gave rise to this poem?

Dilruba Ahmed: The word “resistance” has been on my mind recently: what does it mean to engage in very public acts of resistance, such as protests and marches, as well as more subtle or even private acts of opposition? Part of the lesser-known history of the South Asian immigrant community here in the US, for example, includes families organizing fundraisers together to support Bangladesh’s war for independence. Women prepared pounds and pounds of “chana chur” (a spicy and savory snack) in Philadelphia and the tri-state area to sell at a large gathering in Washington, DC, and then sent the proceeds back home. I’m interested in the ways that—particularly during difficult times—a seemingly small act can contribute to a greater purpose. And how those acts, even when they occur in relative isolation, can bind people together toward a common goal.

On a more public level, I only recently learned of my aunts’ participation in anti-government rallies in the ’50s, during a time of Pakistani rule in present-day Bangladesh. Crowds of women involved in the Bengali language movement shouted in the streets, wearing black saris—with even my mother (just a child at that time) swept along in the tide of vocal resistors.

In this particular poem, I was thinking of the various forms of private and public resistance by women under Taliban rule in Afghanistan, and the risks involved. I was interested in conveying the notion of resistance as not only fighting back, but also finding ways to thrive under very difficult circumstances.

When I consider the incredible resurgence of civic engagement of the last two years here in the US, I find it very humbling to dwell on the lives of women in situations like this. Doing so certainly lends some perspective to the present challenge of organizing and/or participating in protests and other calls to action, engaging lawmakers, placing phone calls, etc. in the midst of the demands of work and family, but still within an existence (for many of us) of relative privilege, comfort, and/or freedom. […continue reading here]

An excerpt from “To Pray Like A Child” by Alicia Jo Rabins (poetry, ’09) published at Awst Press:

To Pray Like A Child

I have flown halfway around the world to be with other Jews. I have dreamed of my first Shabbat in Jerusalem, to be in the Holy City on the holy day.  But I have come first to the Mediterranean port town of Haifa, two hours north, to study Hebrew at the university. And the only hostel in Haifa is a Christian hostel. So my first Shabbat in Israel is a Christian Shabbat.

Friday night, strangers gather in the hostel backyard in our best traveling clothes. We stand in a circle as the hostel desk attendant claps the two challahs together and holds them in the air. “Hamotzi lechem min haaretz. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ we bless this challah.”

When I was in middle school, many of my friends went to church youth group together on Thursdays after school. When they invited me to join, I begged my parents—there’s nothing about Jesus, I swear—until finally they allowed me to go, though they would not let me wear a cross around my neck—it’s just for fashion, Mom, I swear. I would walk with my friends to the church down the street from our middle school and hold hands in a circle during prayer time. In the warm camaraderie of the linoleum-floored, wood-paneled church basement, I tried to ignore the dull sense that I was not supposed to be there, that I was in some way lying both to the eager teenager leading the youth group and to myself. […continue reading here]

An excerpt from “Truth” by Rick Bursky (poetry, ’03) published at the AGNI blog:

Truth

If George Orwell hadn’t said “myths which are believed in tend to become true,” I would have. And you could probably say the same about truth in a poem: “poems which are believed in tend to become true.” Truth is important but never let it become an obsession. There are more versions of truth than lies.

That something might have actually happened is not the most important part of truth. The emotional truth is what’s critical. With this said, every word I’ve ever written is true. I would swear on a blood-stained bible that each and every one of my poems happened as written…and my fingers are not crossed behind my back.

I used to date a lovely, young lawyer. We would often go SCUBA diving. In a poem, I once wrote: “Kathy…was futzing with her equipment.” She was angered by this line, claimed it never happened. (Imagine, a lawyer lecturing a poet on truth! That’s when I began making notes on what will one day be a book on truth, a book that will become a textbook in the most prestigious law schools.) I tried to explain to her that something didn’t actually have to happen for it to be true. What made the line of poetry true was she could have futzed with her SCUBA gear, and I knew her well enough to know that once we surfaced she was thinking of how she might readjust her equipment—she was thinking of futzing! And a thought is as close as you need to come to action to make something true. Of course, she argued that the entire poem had little to do with reality. I disagreed; the problem was that she was only aware of a small slice of the world. […continue reading here]

An excerpt from “Love and Kierkegaard in the Age of Trump” By Rachel Howard (fiction, ’09) published at The Los Angeles Review of Books:

Love and Kierkegaard in the Age of Trump

I LIVE IN SEMI-RURAL Nevada County, California, and a year ago, in my gym, I overheard a tall, pale, buzz-cut, older-but-still-muscled man — a man I had once witnessed huffing in the direction of the TVs above the treadmills, “I don’t care what color you are, when an officer pulls you over you do whatever he says!” — I heard this man complaining to a friend at the bench press. “Liberal media,” he said, snorting at one of the TVs. “They twist everyone’s words. They make me sick.”

This was the week after neo-Nazis marched in Charlottesville, the week after Donald Trump picked up the narrative the right-wing media had prepared — the narrative the neo-Nazis had baited — by blaming counter-protestors for violence “on both sides.” I suspected I should stick to my StairMaster, but my skin twitched. For months I had watched the gym’s bank of TVs broadcast competing news stations side by side, the cross-captioning of each talking head suggesting parallel black holes, and I could hold the tension no longer. I crossed the gym floor, and stood at this man’s shoulder. I said, “I’m equally troubled by Fox News, if you want to know.” He drew his spike-haired head back in shock. And then this man and I stared, mutually baffled, as the whole gym watched.

That standoff now seems innocent. In the year since a white nationalist killed an innocent woman in Charlottesville, more Americans have moved their turf wars off Facebook and into the streets. In my grocery store parking lot, confederate flags are now popping up alongside the Make America Great Again bumper stickers. A few weeks ago, at the local “Families Belong Together” march protesting the separation of children at the border, “Motorists at the intersection responded by honking their horns, popping wheelies on their motorcycles, flipping the bird, or screaming ‘build the wall’” — so reported the front page of our little local paper.

[…continue reading here]

An excerpt from an Interview with Natalie Baszile (fiction, ’07), published at Signature:

An Interview with Natalie Baszile: Writing Queen Sugar and More

In 2014, Natalie Baszile — the renowned author whose first novel Queen Sugar quickly became one of television’s most revolutionary series — wrote the following: “Writing will turn out to be the most challenging thing I’ve ever done besides raising my children. I will experience pendulum swings of exhilaration and crushing self-doubt. But I don’t know any of that yet. Bumping over the railroad tracks, all I know is that I’ve leaped off the cliff. I’m terrified, but I can’t stop smiling.” Nearly five years later, Baszile’s unblinkingly honest and vivid portrait of family, legacy, and love is as necessary as it was the day it debuted. The series, brought to life with the help of the legendary Melissa Carter, Ava DuVernay, and Oprah Winfrey, Queen Sugar’s on-screen adaptation has captivated millions of viewers via the same arresting complexity and heart that drew readers to the pages of its literary predecessor. Whether on the page or as a series, Baszile’s narratives feel deeply personal yet universal in an unshakeable and bone-deep way. The worlds that she creates are more than stories. They’re mirrors reminding us who we really are, where we came from, and where we’re headed.

In celebration of the end of “Queen Sugar”’s third season and in anticipation of its fourth, we spoke with Baszile about what the evolution of her novel has taught her, why storytelling and art is a refuge, how she battles self-doubt, and why books that endure are so vital.

SIGNATURE: In the final paragraph of an essay that you published in the 2014 issue of O, The Oprah Magazineyou describe writing as a challenging yet euphoric uncertainty. Has Queen Sugar‘s evolution, as a novel and as a series, changed your emotional relationship to storytelling and craft?

NATALIE BASZILE: First of all, I think that I am even more committed to being honest. I think that the beauty of storytelling — the moment that it’s most magical — is when the reader or the viewer recognizes something in the work that is undeniably true. That happens to me when I read books, and it’s not in every book, but there are books that I’ve come across where every time I read them — it doesn’t matter if I read them two times, five times, or thirteen times — every time I read them, I get a feeling. I have an emotional response because there is something in the work that I recognize from my own experience. That to me is the power of storytelling. It’s when you as the author, or you as the writer of the series, or the director can track the arc of human emotion, the small turns of human emotion, and you can feel that and you can convey that to the reader or to the viewer. There’s no underestimating how difficult that is. It requires a level of vulnerability and keen observation and patience. It’s what I admire in a handful of books that I’ve read and it’s what I admire in in the [Queen Sugar] series, where I feel that truth and that’s just undeniable. That’s what I love about storytelling. It’s what I love about film and art in general. It’s that moment of undeniable truth and it is what I live for as a writer.

[…continue reading here]

An excerpt from “Rivington” by Andrea Donderi (fiction, ’14), published at The Catamaran Literary Reader:

Rivington

For a while there hadn’t been much out the window but skunks and fog. The last audiobook ended this morning as we’d crossed down into California. Now there was nothing on the radio but talk shows for getting riled up or ballads for crying and by this point even those were sputtering out.

Rivington’s email had mentioned two roads. They’ll both get you there, he said, but the one you want cuts straight across the pass. The wrong one squiggles up into the mountains. I must have mixed them up, because the farmland gave way to forest twenty minutes ago. Now things were getting narrower and steeper and twistier. The first few spatters of rain were steadying into a down – pour. It was getting dark fast and there wasn’t anywhere to turn around.

I’d hoped we could make it through this last stretch without stopping, but in the seat behind me, Tupper was whimpering and panting a little. He probably had to pee. I did too. The headlights lit up a diamond-shaped sign, warning yellow, with the silhouette of a leaping deer. It had been a couple of months since my job had evaporated. Our whole company had folded.

I hadn’t been attached to the work and I wasn’t panicking yet about money, but “folded” was the right word for me too. I had no idea where to go next. My parents had owned a garden center near Louisville when I was growing up; sometimes I missed it. I’d posted something about maybe working with plants again. […continue reading here]